Jump to content

Daishain

Member
  • Content Count

    351
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    %

Posts posted by Daishain


  1. Have you looked at the G&G M14 HBA? Essentially the same design as the Classic Army, but a higher externals quality. Also a bit pricier at around $500.

     

    Also, I looked into the same stock issue before. The mounting points are radically different, and as a result, it appears the only means by which you can change the stock style would be to swap out or significantly modify the body.

     

    Assuming you don't have access to a machine shop equipped to make such modifications that aren't 100 times as ugly as the crane stock itself, swapping the body will cost you nearly as much as the gun itself, or even more if you're forced to go for a conversion kit.

     

    P.S. The Kart version of this gun, which has been rebranded to the Echo1, uses an unfortunately high degree of pot metal in the body. Unless you want to stage a dramatic scene where you snap your gun over your knee in an "impressive show of strength", I suggest avoiding it.


  2. A ref/marshal needs to have three things going for them. A good attitude, experience, and an ability to make sure the people they're overseeing actually listen to them.

     

    Generally speaking, the younger a person is, the less likely they are to have any of these attributes, much less all three. (not that there is any age group guaranteed to have them) That last one is particularly tricky for a young person, however mature they may be, many people are not especially willing to take them seriously. However, if they are one of the exceptions, and do genuinely have all three factors, a referee could be 12 years old for all I care.


  3. Hakkotsu thunder B's

     

    Not entirely reuseable, but paying about a buck per grenade toss isn't bad. And if someone steals the thing, I'm out $20 rather than $100

     

    I've mostly used them to help clear out pockets of resistance that are difficult to root out by other means.

     

    Only catch is there's enough variation in the delay to make timing a breach and clear difficult.


  4. Its easier from a budget and legal standpoint to get your hands on airsoft equipment to model after, so it shouldn't be that surprising.

     

    That said, the odds that none of them knew the difference between an airsoft magazine and a real one are quite low. So it seems likely that it was deliberately left in.


  5. A good AEG DMR can and will save your :censored2: when stealth fails you, I wouldn't discount them entirely. Yes they make a bit more noise, but unless you are shooting at a long range target while another enemy is 15 meters away, it is not likely to make a difference given the usual chaos of the battlefield. Also, even the loudest AEG can be made to be almost completely silent, although it can take quite a bit of elbow grease and upgrade parts to manage it.

     

    A spring sniper rifle is going to be the easiest to work with for your stated goal, but they too take quite a bit of upgrade work. Mostly in terms of upgrading them to the point where they actually have a practical advantage over the AEGs.

     

    Gas rifles (preferably non blowback if you can actually find one) are also on the table.

     

    However, all of this belies the main point. No amount of equipment is going to make up for a lack of skill in the role, and to be perfectly frank and blunt, being a true sniper can be quite boring for most people. It takes patience, quick thinking, and a nack for planning ahead.

     

    My suggestion? Get a simple but good quality gas pistol, bring something to make melee kills with, and play a few games using nothing but those items. Do well, and you MIGHT have it in you to make getting a sniper rifle worth the money and effort.


  6. This sounds a lot like the argument made in my state that if gay marriage was legalized, all marriages would be annulled, though current marriages could re-apply with the new system. The catch would be that all future marriages would be granted using a quota system in order to not discriminate against one class or the other. Basically an argument similar to reason #2 in my previous post.

     

    The quota system would be based on percentages within the population. So that means if it was determined that 10% of the population is gay (just as an example, the real percentage is lower) 90 marriage licenses would be issued for straight couples while 10 would be issued for gay couples. Beyond that, new marriage licenses of each type would not be issued any farther until both types were depleted. So inevitably one type or the other would end up short.

    What possible advantage would there be to doing this? It sounds like an excellent way to make a buttload of unnecessary work for those involved in marriage licences while pissing off pretty much every single citizen.


  7. Our government's systems for holding information on people are ancient dinosaurs. They barely would even work if not for the database being simple. Gay marriage would complicate it OR risk offense. Why? Because marriage licenses are entered in the system under the MAN'S name, with a DB link to the WOMAN'S name. Who's the man in your relationship, ladies? Think long and hard about this one, because it's permanently on the record.

    Or option C

     

    Pay some random script kiddie $500 to adapt a better database system from the literally hundreds of successful models that already exist. Frankly, for the amount of time and effort needed, that much money is probably overkill. Given that this is the US government, which likes to do things in the least efficient manner possible, they'll probably involve far more people working for far longer and given unrealistic stretch goals to boot, it will cost more and take more time. But it should still cost peanuts compared to their usual budget regardless.

     

    I don't know about you, but I tend to discount digital paperwork issues as a legitimate obstacle to human rights. Especially not in a case like this when the needed update should already have been done decades ago simply for the sake of not wasting time and money struggling with it.


  8. I understand that a woman can raise a son, and a father can raise a daughter. It happens all the time. It's just an example that it sometimes "works better". (By the way, yes I made a typo, but I edited it.) I'm not sexist either. There was nothing I did to have you accuse me of being that. (Not a good reason anyway.)

    I tried a couple of times to come up with a polite and informative means of telling you why the opinion you expressed about genders and their role in raising children is both sexist and incorrect. But I failed.

     

    Instead, let me simply provide you with a warning. Unless you want to get reamed out in ways that the people in this thread haven't even come close to doing, never express that particular tidbit to a militant feminist.

     

    You know, you guys think we should have more tolerance, (we do) but you have no tolerance for us, our beliefs, or the Bible.

    There are people in the world who have zilch tolerance for Christianity and/or religion in general and wish to see it eliminated or at least marginalized. Some have compelling arguments and reasons for this stance, others are just fools with a grudge. To my knowledge however, none of them are posting in this thread. I may have missed something though, feel free to point out anyone that stated or implied you weren't free to follow your beliefs as you see fit.

     

    All we are asking is that you extend that same consideration to others. All individuals in this country have the right to live their lives as they choose, regardless of the religious beliefs they or their neighbors hold to, subject only to laws that have a compelling secular basis behind them. That is among the most important founding principles of this nation.

     

    Furthermore, being a good citizen means standing up for the rights of all other Americans, even if that means defending the right of others to do something you personally disagree with. So long as you don't cross the line into harassment, you are perfectly free to convince them they are doing something fundamentally wrong, but you cannot use legal means to force them into that behavior, or allow others to do the same.

     

    Take the Westboro Baptist Church for instance. They are a strong example of why many individuals think Christianity/religion is a bad thing to have around. I myself loathe this particular group due to the actions they have taken and wish to see them disbanded, preferably in a humiliating fashion. In spite of this however, I will actively fight against any attempt to prevent them from following their beliefs. Even as I push for laws that would help protect the people they victimize.


  9. I get all of what you're saying, but about homosexuals adopting, does it really seem right to have two dads or two moms? Kids are supposed to have a mother and father. Not two of one or the other. I'm not saying homosexuals aren't a lot of times, alright parents. All I'm saying is that it isn't natural. (Again, not in an insulting way.)

    Two things:

     

    First, if you start worrying about what families kids are raised in, you need to ban a huge number of families from raising children. Almost no parent is ever really ready to raise children, and quite a few of them are woefully equipped to do so. Frankly, I would trust the average homosexual couple who wanted to adopt a child with said child more than the average heterosexual couple that forgot birth control. The former pair are much more likely to be prepared and have actually done their homework ahead of time. and it also pretty firmly deals with the issue of whether or not the parents actually WANT the kid.

     

    Secondly, marriage itself is not natural, nor are nuclear family units, nor is children being raised exclusively by their parents. Everything about the way modern society handles family life is an artificial construct of society. There isn't anything natural about it to begin with. It can't even be claimed that modern family life is like it was meant to be in the bible, these days we call what was described in there child abuse, slavery, and misogyny, among many other things that carry nasty prison sentences.


  10. Alright, fine. Either way I don't think I would support it. If you look at Flamingpotatoes somewhat graphic post a while back, you will see my reason. Men and women are supposed to marry and have children.

    And again, I rather wish they would slow down on that front. The population of the earth needs to start shrinking for a bit, or at least cease its expansion.

     

    Regardless, what makes you think this issue has any bearing whatsoever on that front? Keep the ban, and you've got a group of people leading generally lonely lives, not forming relationships with the opposite gender, and not having children. Get rid of the ban, and the same group of people at least have a shot at not leading lonely lives, are still not forming relationships with the opposite gender, and still not having children. If anything, the latter choice would boost overall childbirth rates by a little bit, since homosexual couples are likely to start adopting, and taking pressure off of that front.

     

    The only legislative means by which you could change the situation so that all men and women follow that particular image of domestic family life, is if you removed choice and control from the lives of others. And that my friend, is the mark of an evil tyrant, you don't want to go down that path.


  11. I'm not sure if I can technically call it my dream gun since I just bought it, but the M14 EBR mod 0.

     

    It is a heavy, long, and intimidating gun built like a tank, and is very well suited for accurized fire. Meanwhile I'm a big guy who is particularly good at taking snap shots at medium to long range, so it suits me and my playstyle quite well. I'll be working on upgrading it to meet fairly demanding performance requirements over the next few weeks.


  12. Personally? If you can skip the beginner guns, go for it. The learning curve for their use is not really going to be significantly different, meaning the only practical difference is in terms of how well a particular gun performs, lasts and/or can be upgraded, vs its cost.

     

    As for what kind of gun in particular would be a good choice for you. We need to know more about how it will be used, and perhaps even more importantly, what your budget is.

     

    Until I know how you plan to use the gun and how much you can afford, I'm afraid I really can't help you.


  13. Really, what has been "acceptable to God" hasn't changed. Would he really give in and change just because we wanted him to? No! He wouldn't. About voting, I can't control what happens in this country, and you know what? I hope that they can legally marry, but I'm not going to help it happen. I'm not saying that in a rude way, but I follow my religion and I'm not going to try to stretch the rules. I don't think our church has said, "Don't vote for gay marriage." We just believe that marriage is to be with a man and a woman. And come on!? I make "rational decisions". We can't completely know what all of the reasons are, but we can have something that we call "faith". Ever heard of it? Look up the definition and you will see.

    Actually, I am of the opinion that god should indeed change his standards over time, knowing that humanity is changing and growing, much like any good leader/ruler/parent/guardian. but that's largely beside the point.

     

    What has DEFINITELY changed, is what humanity thinks god's standards are. There are millions of different iterations of the Christian faith, and absolutely none of the ones that exist today are anything like the ones that existed back when the faith was founded. If you aren't prepared to accept the possibility that your version of the Christian faith might still need some work to bring it closer to the truth, you've crossed a dangerous line.

     

    Faith simply means that you accept something as true without sufficient evidence to prove it. That does not mean it does not require rationalization. If people fail to test their faith from time to time, what they have is not religion, but a cult.

     

    If you can accept that, think about this. The overall trend as the Christian faith has evolved has been to move away from the incredibly violent and antisocial behavior suggested by the old testament, and towards a form of humanitarianism built around the core teachings of Jesus. The book of Leviticus in particular, which contains the damning passage against homosexuality, is being increasingly ignored as completely irrelevant to modern society.

     

    Perhaps humanity is moving towards the truth god wishes for us to accept, perhaps we're moving away, it is tough to say. One thing's for sure though, if the god described by the old testament is the one in charge, we'd be seeing a hell of a lot of divine wrath right now.

     

    As for your continued stance that you're simply not willing to help out, but would like to see it happen. I'm sorry to say, that's not how it works in a democratic system. Every individual that fails to make their opinion known is effectively allowing the opposing side an extra vote, since they have that much less to overcome. Even in choices where you don't like either outcome, you need to decide which is preferable to you, and support it.


  14. It depends on the context.

     

    The vast majority of people who commit suicide, or attempt to do so, simply need help. And I do not mean that in the "he/she's crazy" sense. Most people who attempt suicide are quite sane, often painfully so.

     

    Either they literally need help with their life and have found no other means to get others to pay attention or give a damn, and/or they simply have failed to see another way out of the situation they find themselves in. Most feel trapped and abandoned by the world, with no other options left to them

     

    In the former case, simply listening, really, truly, and honestly listening, is often enough to bring them back from the brink to get them the help they need. The latter is a little more complex, it still requires that you listen carefully to what they say, but takes input from your end. It ends up a lot like a diagnostics session, with the goal being to get them to think beyond whatever issue they're hung up on, and hopefully see a path going forward. Hint: if you find yourself saying ridiculous stuff like "but there's so much to live for!", you aren't helping at all.

     

    That is something I can do, and definitely would do if within my ability.

     

    There are a few exceptions however. In some cases, (very few, but they do exist) the individual has literally nothing to live for. Not even that basic staple of human life, hope. When all the continuation of life will bring is more pain, asking them to stay the course is selfish and cruel.

     

    In any event, this man puts it better than I can, largely because he has been in this situation all too many times.

     

    https://www.ted.com/talks/kevin_briggs_the_...uicide_and_life


  15. What if I don't know how to do a tuneup in the gearbox? You have read my past threads and probably know that I'm not the most experienced in airsoft internals. Actually, I'm not experienced at all. Embarrassing, but true.

    I know you're not experienced, but you also have said you want to learn this stuff. If you still do, you're going to have to try your hand at this stuff sometime.

     

    If on the other hand you really don't want to mess with it for now, then it becomes a gamble.

     

    Very, very few guns, regardless of make and model, come with a good shim job, much less proper angle of engagement on the piston, or decent lube on the surfaces that rub together. Nearly all of the decent ones are going to be close enough that they won't cause major issues. But a poor shim job will cost you in terms of gearbox power and wear down the internal components of the gun faster than normal, and pistons can wear out ridiculously fast with poor AOE. Also, if you ever try to use the gun with a high power battery, this extra wear and tear can become even worse.

     

    If you aren't particularly unlucky, this process is slow enough that it can take months of relatively light use before it makes a real difference. But still, there's a reason that a shim job and other tuneup operations are among the first things people do to their guns.

     

    If you have patience, and pay attention to what you're doing, a basic tuneup can be a little tedious, but not difficult. The main danger lies in terms of losing parts, and in nearly all cases you should easily be able to tell if you are reassembling it wrong.


  16. So long as you don't abuse it, none of the P90 models mentioned here have a high chance of breaking prematurely. The V6 gearbox is one of the strongest and most durable designs available, and the body itself, while made of polymer even on the real gun, is also a very sturdy design.

     

    With that stated, as you should be aware by now, there are absolutely no guarantees when it comes to how long a gun will last. In addition, while you can get away with just using the gun straight out of the box, doing a tuneup inside the gearbox will improve lifespan considerably.


  17. JG/Echo1 for $160 The model is solid, nothing spectacular, but I can tell you from experience that it doesn't take too much work to turn it into a beast of a gun.

     

    One problem with the P90 platform is feeding issues. their hi caps, no matter what brand, pretty much always have problems. Said problems can be dealt with, and typically go away as the magazines are are broken in, but it is an annoying concern.

     

    A lot of p90 users go for midcaps instead, but this can present its own issues, since the magazines are fairly large and don't fit in standard magazine holders.

     

    If you don't want to work with midcaps, one other means of bypassing this would be to go for Evike's "Terminator" P90 for $200, which is just an Echo1 with a silencer, extra rails, and a 1500 round box magazine that feeds into/via an M4 hi cap. Overkill, but potentially worth it to avoid having to mess with jams. You could also buy the box mag seperately, but it costs less to just get it with the gun.


  18. Don't get me wrong. I totally agree that a war between militias and the government is totally ridiculous and implausible. That was never part of my argument. I am saying that any gun that is legal now will help you in said implausible conflict. I still don't know that people here have more access to such equipment, but I think we've actually agreed that the argument is irrelevant.

     

    And I should have clarified, my apologies. I meant to say first world countries (The U.S. does lead the first world countries in firearm-related death rate), where economic and social factors aren't as likely to cause such violence.

    If you limit it to first world countries, what you say is technically accurate, but misleading.

     

    Why? Over two thirds of the firearm related deaths in the US are suicides, not murders. This ratio is fairly high among first world countries, leading to a fair amount of bias if one fails to take it into account.


  19. Why assume that rebels here would have access to better equipment? "If" the government were to fight against it's own people, the people simply wouldn't stand a chance. The 2nd Amendment was written when the states were coming together for the first time. Risk of invasion was high. Risk of a failure in the new government was high. Risk of a civil war was high. It made more sense that people should have been concerned. The country has changed since then.

     

    Is it not hard to ignore that the country with the most guns per capita is the one with the most gun-related crimes?

    Because they already do have access to better equipment? Hell, my father is better equipped in that sense than most of the fighters we're having trouble with over in Iraq and Afghanistan. And we're just talking a rifle and pistol here, not assault weapons, nor some huge stockpile of the standard guns.

     

    If the government honestly became corrupt and insane enough to use the military against its own people, and if they via some miracle avoided a huge portion of the military choosing to uphold their oaths and instead just follow orders, and if said government chose to just flatten everything rather than taking care to avoid killing noncombatants and destroying infrastructure. Then sure, the people wouldn't stand a chance, but that's a lot of ifs.

     

    The first condition might be possible. The second condition is entirely impossible short of some kind of widespread mind control in use on the soldier (the vast majority of soldiers are FAR more likely to shoot the man who gave them such an order than follow it) The last condition would be akin to slitting your own throat to remove an object you're choking on. So no, not going to happen.

     

    If such a war broke out, and if those initiating it held control of enough of the military to avoid being immediately flattened instead, it would very quickly become a slugfest where the government quickly finds out that it is largely helpless to strike at the rebels in any significant manner, who in turn have zilch issue cutting the government off from all supply lines.

     

    P.S. It is indeed easy to ignore, largely because it is not remotely true. That particular distinction goes to the Honduras, who get a whopping 70 firearm related homicides per 100,000 people, in spite of only having 6 firearms per 100 people. This would be compared to the United States' 2.8 per 100,000 firearm homicides and 88 per 100 firearms. Frankly, the number of firearms in a region seems to have almost no impact whatsoever on crime rates, with economic and social factors being the only reliable variables for predicting crime. This holds true even within the US. Multiple regions with lax gun laws and plenty of guns have high gun related crime rates. Many others have far less than certain regions with extremely strict gun control.

×
×
  • Create New...